On refudiating new words

How do new words arise in a language? Are they even legitimate? Does usage make a new word suddenly acceptable to the dictionary?

A hot question is now spreading through the internet – is Sarah Palin’s neologism ‘refudiate’  (coined on 18 July on Twitter) a legitimate word? It has already received 38,200 citations on Google even as I type (and will now become 3,201!). She claims every right to coin words like this (which is actually a portmanteau of refute and repudiate), since English is a living language and even Shakespeare was not above coining new words. In her case, she uses this word to more or less mean denying legitimacy to a proposal (it is used in the context of asking New Yorkers to reject the building pf a religious structure).

On the web, refudiate has stirred controversy, as dictionary-makers take sides on whether popular usage allows for legitimacy or not. Should dictionaries be merely descriptive, or act as protectors of the language? Keep an ear open, the debate isn’t over yet!

Advertisements

About ozymandias

What am I? A body and brain, products of carbon concatenation chemistry, an intelligence and conscience to enable bits of DNA evolve. Maybe a pharaoh, maybe a dung-beetle, never more than a safe conduit for some genes.
This entry was posted in Wordsmithville and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to On refudiating new words

  1. Pingback: crash blossoms in net puzzle « R K SWAMY Interactive

  2. Pingback: The Internet: Professional Provocateuress par excellence |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s